Cisco wireless controller comparison

C9800-40-K9 vs CW9800M

The CW9800M is the replacement Cisco names for the C9800-40-K9. The CW9800M supports 3,000 access points against 2,000 and adds 25G uplinks, with the same client limit in one rack unit. Buy the C9800-40-K9 only to complete an installed high-availability pair, which needs identical hardware.

2models compared
31specs published for every model
13confirmed differences
Change comparison

Select different models

  1. 1Choose a category
  2. 2Select models
Choose a product categoryAll selected models must be from the same category.
Select models to compareChoose two to four exact Cisco Product IDs.

Select one category and at least two different models.

At-a-glance comparison

Key capacity and performance specifications

Start with the specifications that decide whether a model fits, whether they differ or not. Each card says if the values are the same.

Maximum Access PointsDifferent

C9800-40-K9

2,000

CW9800M

3,000

Maximum ClientsSame

C9800-40-K9

32,000

CW9800M

32,000

Maximum ThroughputDifferent

C9800-40-K9

40 Gbps

CW9800M

50 Gbps

Wi-Fi Standards and BandsSame

C9800-40-K9

Wi-Fi 5 Wave 2, Wi-Fi 6/6E and Wi-Fi 7 APs; 2.4, 5 and 6 GHz

CW9800M

Wi-Fi 5 Wave 2, Wi-Fi 6/6E and Wi-Fi 7 APs; 2.4, 5 and 6 GHz

Wi-Fi 7 SupportSame

C9800-40-K9

From Cisco IOS XE 17.15.2, with Multi-Link Operation and 320 MHz channels in 6 GHz

CW9800M

From Cisco IOS XE 17.15.2, with Multi-Link Operation and 320 MHz channels in 6 GHz

Uplink PortsDifferent

C9800-40-K9

4 x 1/10G SFP+

CW9800M

4 x 1/10G SFP+; 2 x 25G SFP28

How to choose between C9800-40-K9 and CW9800M

Replace the C9800-40-K9 with the CW9800M if the network is still growing

The CW9800M supports 3,000 access points against 2,000 on the C9800-40-K9. Its throughput rises from 40 to 50 Gbps. Each site can hold 300 FlexConnect access points against 100, which suits branch networks.

Choose the C9800-40-K9 only to complete an installed HA pair

The C9800-40-K9 is no longer sold but still supported by Cisco, so a working pair can stay in service while you plan the move. Buy one only as the standby for an installed unit, because stateful switchover pairs only identical hardware.

Before replacing the C9800-40-K9, check releases and optics

The CW9800M needs Cisco IOS XE 17.14.1 or later, so confirm the release supports every access point model in service. Wi-Fi 7 is no reason to replace: both run Wi-Fi 7 access points from 17.15.2. Check SFP+ optics against the CW9800M's supported list.

Free product-selection help

Need help deciding between these Cisco models?

Send your port, performance, license, quantity or deployment requirements. A CCIE-level network engineer will review the shortlist and help identify the better-fit Product ID.

Detailed comparison

Full specification comparison

Comparison parameter
Product ID C9800-40-K9CW9800M
Product and ordering
Product Type Cisco Catalyst 9800-40 Wireless ControllerCisco Catalyst CW9800M Wireless Controller
Scale and performance
Maximum Access Points 2,0003,000
Maximum Clients 32,00032,000
Maximum Throughput 40 Gbps50 Gbps
Maximum Site Tags 2,0003,000
Maximum FlexConnect APs per Site 100300
Maximum WLANs 4,0964,096
Maximum VLANs 4,0964,096
Wi-Fi and software
Wi-Fi Standards and Bands Wi-Fi 5 Wave 2, Wi-Fi 6/6E and Wi-Fi 7 APs; 2.4, 5 and 6 GHz6 GHz (Wi-Fi 6E) access points need Cisco IOS XE 17.7.1 or later.Wi-Fi 5 Wave 2, Wi-Fi 6/6E and Wi-Fi 7 APs; 2.4, 5 and 6 GHz
Wi-Fi 7 Support From Cisco IOS XE 17.15.2, with Multi-Link Operation and 320 MHz channels in 6 GHzWi-Fi 7 WLANs need WPA3; from Cisco IOS XE 17.15.3 a WLAN that does not meet the Wi-Fi 7 requirements runs as 802.11ax. Each access point model has its own minimum release.From Cisco IOS XE 17.15.2, with Multi-Link Operation and 320 MHz channels in 6 GHzWi-Fi 7 WLANs need WPA3; from Cisco IOS XE 17.15.3 a WLAN that does not meet the Wi-Fi 7 requirements runs as 802.11ax. Each access point model has its own minimum release.
Operating System Cisco IOS XECisco IOS XE
Minimum Software Release Cisco IOS XE 16.10.1Cisco IOS XE 17.14.1
Deployment Modes Centralized, FlexConnect and fabric (SD-Access)Centralized, FlexConnect and fabric (SD-Access)
Ports and interfaces
Uplink Ports 4 x 1/10G SFP+4 x 1/10G SFP+; 2 x 25G SFP28
HA Redundancy Ports 1 x RJ-45; 1 x 1G SFPSFP redundancy port optics: GLC-LH-SMD or GLC-SX-MMD.1 x RJ-45; 1 x 1/10G SFPSFP redundancy port optics: GLC-SX-MMD, GLC-LH-SMD, SFP-10G-SR, SFP-10G-SR-S, SFP-10G-LR or SFP-10G-LR-S.
Management Ports 1 x RJ-45 service port1 x RJ-45 service port
Console Ports 1 x RJ-45 console; 1 x mini-USB console1 x RJ-45 console; 1 x micro-USB console
USB Ports 2 x USB 3.02 x USB 3.0
High availability and power
Stateful Switchover (SSO) Supported (1:1 active-standby)Supported (1:1 active-standby)
N+1 Redundancy SupportedSupported
Default Power Supply Single 750 W AC power supplySingle 750 W AC power supply
Power Redundancy 1+1 with an optional second AC power supply1+1 with an optional second AC power supply
Maximum Power Consumption 381 W350 W
Heat Dissipation 1,300 BTU/h1,194 BTU/h
Physical and environmental
Form Factor 1RU1RU
Dimensions (H × W × D) 43.7 × 439.4 × 495.3 mm43.9 × 439.4 × 467.4 mm
Weight 10.34 kg9.3 kg
Operating Temperature 0 to 40 °C; 0 to 50 °C short term0 to 40 °C; 0 to 50 °C short term
Operating Humidity 10% to 90%; 5% to 90% short term10% to 90%; 5% to 90% short term
Operating Altitude Up to 3,000 m (10,000 ft)Up to 3,000 m (10,000 ft)
Warranty 1-year limited hardware warranty1-year limited hardware warranty

“Not published by Cisco” and “Not listed” indicate that a confirmed direct comparison is unavailable. These rows are not counted as confirmed differences.

Still comparing Cisco models?
Price, stock & lead time

Get pricing for the exact models you compared

Use the exact Product ID when requesting a quote, because suffixes can identify different licenses, regions or configurations. Open an available product page for details and pricing, or request a project quote from our team.

Browse all Cisco wireless controllers
Related comparisons

More Cisco wireless controller comparisons

View all popular Cisco Wireless Controller Comparisons →