Cisco Catalyst C9200 vs C9300: Which Switch Should You Buy in 2025?

Choosing the right Cisco access switch for a campus or branch refresh in 2025 almost always comes down to Cisco Catalyst C9200 vs C9300. Both are part of the Catalyst 9000 Series, both run IOS XE, and both support SD-Access and advanced security. But they target different performance tiers and network sizes.

This 2025 buying guide walks through a practical C9200 vs C9300 comparison so you can decide which Cisco access switch is best for your network, your Wi-Fi 6 deployment and your budget.

Cisco Catalyst C9200 vs C9300: quick comparison in 2025

  • Cisco Catalyst 9200 / C9200L
    • Successor to Catalyst 2960-X/XR.
    • Designed for mainstream enterprise access and branch offices.
    • StackWise-160 / StackWise-80 stacking, up to 8 switches per stack.
    • PoE+ power budget sufficient for typical IP phones, Wi-Fi APs and cameras.
    • Best fit: cost-optimized access switch with 1G to the desktop and up to 10G uplinks.
  • Cisco Catalyst 9300 / C9300X / C9300L
    • Successor to Catalyst 3850; Cisco’s lead enterprise access switch.
    • Higher stacking bandwidth (StackWise-480 / StackWise-1T) for large campus deployments.
    • Rich 10G/25G/40G uplink options, StackPower and UPOE support.
    • Best fit: high-density campus access, Wi-Fi 6/6E, and long-term 25G-ready designs.

If you are looking for the best Cisco access switch in 2025 for a typical branch or office, C9200 is often enough. If you are building a large, wireless-heavy campus where scale and future 25G uplinks matter, C9300 is usually the better choice.

Who should choose Cisco Catalyst C9200 in 2025?

Positioning of Cisco Catalyst 9200 series

The Cisco Catalyst 9200 Series (C9200 and C9200L) extends Catalyst 9000 innovation to mainstream access. It is essentially the modern replacement for Cisco 2960-X/XR, bringing intent-based networking, security and automation to smaller campuses and branches.

Key characteristics:

  • Enterprise-class Layer 2/Layer 3 access switch for office floors and branches
  • 24-port and 48-port models, with PoE and non-PoE variants
  • StackWise-160 (C9200) and StackWise-80 (C9200L), up to 8 switches per stack
  • Full PoE+ (30 W per port) with a generous overall PoE budget on PoE SKUs

If you are searching for phrases like “best Cisco access switch 2025 for branch”, “C9200L-48P-4X-E price” or “C9200 vs 2960X upgrade”, this series is usually the most relevant answer.

Typical use cases for C9200 / C9200L

Choose Cisco C9200 / C9200L when:

  • User density per wiring closet is moderate (for example, up to around 200 users).
  • Access is 1G to the desktop, with 1G or 10G uplinks to the core or distribution.
  • You need secure, modern features (Trustworthy Systems, segmentation, SD-Access support) but not the highest hardware scale.
  • Budget is tight and you want strong price-to-performance.

Typical scenarios:

  • Small and medium enterprise office floors
  • Branch offices with a mix of IP phones, Wi-Fi 5/6 APs and a few cameras
  • Cost-effective Layer 3 access switches where 25G uplinks and mGig are not mandatory

Who should choose Cisco Catalyst C9300 in 2025?

Positioning of Cisco Catalyst 9300 series

The Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series is Cisco’s flagship stackable enterprise access switch in the Catalyst 9000 portfolio. It is designed to replace Catalyst 3850 and act as the high-performance wired and wireless access layer for modern campuses.

Highlights:

  • Higher stacking bandwidth with StackWise-480 (and up to StackWise-1T on C9300X)
  • More powerful hardware for advanced QoS, larger routing tables and richer services
  • StackPower to share power across stack members
  • Uplink modules with 10G, 25G and 40G options
  • UPOE and multigigabit support on selected models for high-power Wi-Fi 6/6E APs

Typical use cases for C9300 / C9300X

Standardize on Cisco C9300 if:

  • You are building a large campus network with heavy access-layer traffic.
  • Each wiring closet aggregates many Wi-Fi 6/6E APs or high-bandwidth endpoints.
  • You need 25G or 40G uplinks, advanced QoS and larger Layer 3 scale.
  • You want to host an embedded wireless controller or other applications on the switch.

Typical scenarios:

  • University or hospital campus with dense Wi-Fi coverage
  • Large headquarters buildings with hundreds of APs and many VLANs/VRFs
  • Designs where access stacks behave like small chassis, forwarding large amounts of traffic

C9200 vs C9300 technical comparison (performance, stacking, PoE)

Performance and stacking: StackWise-160 vs StackWise-480 / 1T

Both Cisco Catalyst C9200 and C9300 support stackable designs, but the stacking capacity is very different.

Cisco Catalyst 9200 / 9200L

  • Up to 160 Gbps stack bandwidth on C9200 (StackWise-160)
  • Up to 80 Gbps stack bandwidth on C9200L (StackWise-80)
  • Up to 8 switches per stack

For most office and branch deployments with 1G access and 10G uplinks, this level of stacking performance is sufficient.

Cisco Catalyst 9300 / 9300L / 9300X

  • Up to 480 Gbps stack bandwidth on C9300 (StackWise-480)
  • Up to 320 Gbps on C9300L fixed uplink models
  • Up to 1 Tbps on C9300X (StackWise-1T)

In a C9200 vs C9300 performance comparison, the 9300 series clearly wins on stacking throughput. If your design includes a lot of Wi-Fi traffic, multiple uplinks, or if access stacks carry significant east-west traffic, this extra capacity is important.

PoE power and power architecture

Cisco Catalyst C9200 PoE

  • Supports PoE+ (802.3at, up to 30 W per port) on PoE models
  • High total PoE budget (depending on PSU configuration), suitable for typical APs, IP phones and cameras
  • Features such as Perpetual PoE and Fast PoE improve endpoint uptime during reloads

This makes C9200 a solid choice as a PoE access switch for unified communications and standard Wi-Fi deployments.

Cisco Catalyst C9300 PoE / UPOE / StackPower

  • Supports PoE+, and selected models support UPOE (up to 60 W per port or more)
  • StackPower enables power pooling and sharing across the stack
  • Better suited to high-density AP deployments, high-power endpoints and power-constrained closets

In a C9200 vs C9300 PoE comparison, C9200 is ideal for typical PoE loads, while C9300 is designed for “power-hungry” access layers with UPOE phones, wall-jack APs and IoT devices.

Uplinks: 10G vs 25G vs 40G

Cisco Catalyst C9200 uplinks

  • C9200L models provide fixed uplinks (for example, 4×1G SFP or 4×10G SFP+).
  • Modular C9200 models support network modules, but generally focus on 1G/10G uplinks.

This aligns well with networks that will remain on 10G uplinks for their lifecycle.

Cisco Catalyst C9300 uplinks

  • Uplink module options include 4×1G, 8×10G, 2×40G, and various 25G combinations depending on the model.
  • C9300X adds higher-speed uplinks and multigigabit access ports for Wi-Fi 6/6E APs.

If you are planning a 25G or 40G-ready design, or if you might upgrade your core to 25G in the next 3–5 years, the C9300 vs C9200 comparison strongly favors C9300.

Software, SD-Access and Cisco DNA: is there a difference?

From a software and automation perspective, Cisco Catalyst C9200 and C9300 are quite similar:

  • Both run Cisco IOS XE with programmability and model-driven telemetry.
  • Both support Network Essentials and Network Advantage feature sets.
  • Both can use Cisco DNA Essentials or Cisco DNA Advantage subscriptions.
  • Both integrate with Cisco Catalyst Center (DNA Center) for SD-Access and automation.

Where C9300 has the advantage:

  • Larger Layer 3 and multicast scale for complex designs with more VRFs and routes.
  • Ability to host an embedded wireless controller persona, as well as selected applications such as ThousandEyes or security services on some models.

If your deployment is a simpler access network with limited routing needs, a properly licensed C9200 is usually enough. If you are building a fabric with many VRFs, dynamic routing and convergence of wired and wireless, C9300 provides more headroom.

Real-world buying scenarios: C9200 vs C9300 selection guide

Scenario 1 – Standard office floor / branch (up to ~200 users)

  • 1G to the desktop, 10G uplinks
  • 10–30 access points, IP phones, a few cameras
  • Limited routing complexity

Recommended switch:

  • Cisco Catalyst C9200L-24P-4X-E or C9200L-48P-4X-E as PoE access switches
  • Stack 2–4 units with StackWise-80 / StackWise-160 for resiliency

In this scenario, the best Cisco access switch is usually a C9200L model that balances price and features.

Scenario 2 – High-density Wi-Fi 6/6E campus with many APs

  • Each wiring closet supports dozens of Wi-Fi 6/6E APs
  • Multiple 10G or 25G uplinks to the core
  • Need for higher stacking throughput and larger PoE capacity

Recommended switch:

  • Cisco Catalyst C9300-48P or C9300-48U for UPOE
  • Consider C9300X models if you need 25G uplinks and mGig access ports
  • Use StackWise-480 or StackWise-1T and StackPower for performance and availability

Here, the best Cisco switch for Wi-Fi 6 access points is clearly in the 9300 family.

Scenario 3 – Migrating from 2960X / 3850 to Catalyst 9000

Many enterprises are in the middle of a migration from older Catalyst platforms:

  • Replacing Catalyst 2960-X/XR
  • Replacing Catalyst 3850

General guidance for 2025:

  • Use C9200 / C9200L as the natural successor to 2960-X/XR at the access layer.
  • Use C9300 as the successor to 3850 where you need higher performance and services.

If you are planning a phased migration, you can mix C9200 and C9300 in the same campus design, using C9300 where performance and scale really matter and C9200 where cost optimization is the priority.

FAQ – Cisco Catalyst C9200 vs C9300 in 2025

Not always. Cisco C9300 is more powerful and scalable, but Cisco C9200 often offers better price-performance for standard access and branch networks. If you do not need 25G uplinks, multigigabit ports, UPOE or embedded applications, C9200 may be the smarter choice.

No. C9200/C9200L and C9300/C9300L/C9300X use different StackWise technologies and cannot form a mixed stack. You can deploy them in the same campus as separate stacks (for example, C9300 at the distribution layer and C9200 at the access layer).

For a small number of Wi-Fi 6 access points, Cisco Catalyst C9200 PoE+ models are sufficient. For high-density Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 6E deployments with multigigabit links and higher PoE budgets, Cisco Catalyst C9300 or C9300X with UPOE, StackPower and higher stacking bandwidth is recommended.

Choose Cisco Catalyst 9200 / 9200L when you need a cost-effective enterprise access switch for branches and standard offices with 1G access and 10G uplinks.

Choose Cisco Catalyst 9300 / 9300X when you are building a larger campus network, need high-density Wi-Fi 6/6E, 25G/40G uplinks or want the most future-proof Catalyst 9000 access platform.

Related

Cisco Catalyst 9000 Series Comparison C9200L vs C9200 vs C9300 vs C9400 vs C9500 (2025 Guide)

Cisco Firewall Comparison: ASA, Firepower 1000, 2100, 3100 (2025 Enterprise Technical Guide)

Cisco Router Selection Guide | Catalyst 8000 Series Comparison

Similar Posts